Supreme Court changes rules on extradition


The Ottawa Citizen
Published: Saturday, July 22, 2006

Canada's highest court says judges are not mere rubber stamps in extradition cases -- a ruling that could make it more difficult to send accused people to other countries for trial.

In a pair of decisions handed down yesterday, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously upheld the constitutionality of the 1999 federal law governing extradition. But the court set out a new test for judges when deciding whether an accused person should be handed over to another state.

It says the evidence at hand must amount to a case that could go to trial in Canada and potentially result in a guilty verdict.

"The judge must act as a judge, not a rubber stamp," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin said in writing for the court.

The decision represents a break from the past when a judge had no discretion to refuse to extradite if there was any evidence, "however scant or suspect," supporting the alleged offence.
© The Ottawa Citizen 2006