Saving Canada

Friday, 12 March 2004

Ted Byfield

Confined to a bed in a nursing home at London, Ontario, these past two months is one Robert Ivan Martin, age 64, victim of a stroke four years ago and a hipbreaking fall last December. He is in pain, often in despair for his country, and most of the time alone. Not too many would recognize him as the man who has written the book that I think will help set off a conservative revolution in Canada. Martin is professor of law at the University of Western Ontario and a highly respected academic. His background as a conservative might seem, to put it minimally, unusual. A former agnostic, socialist, Third World liberationist, and ex-patriot of the old far-left Mel Watkins "waffle" movement, he ran twice federally for the NDP and, of course, lost. But to Martin his conservatism is no mystery. He is, he explains, a George Grant conservative and, like the great McMaster philosopher Grant himself, abandoned the socialist movement when he discovered the movement was abandoning most of its founding principles. Martin's book, The Most Dangerous Branch, published last year by McGill-Queens University Press, has taken on a life of its own. In Alberta, people scour the bookstores for a copy of it, can't find one, then scrounge illegal photocopies of this or that chapter and fax them to one another. It suggests what used to be called "salacious literature." And, as Martin himself would concede, in a way it is. For to Martin, the great change in late 20th Century Canada was not essentially political, or economic, or social, or constitutional. It was religious. Unbeknownst to nearly all Canadians and certainly unsought by them, Canada was gratuitously endowed with a "secular state religion." He does not advance this as a sarcasm or a joke, but as a literal fact. "It is a set of ideological beliefs, largely taken on faith, which appears to underlie and motivate the actions of the Canadian state," he writes. "It is enforced and imposed by the state. It is secular because it aggressively denies the existence of a god." He refers, of course, to what is vaguely called the Politically Correct. But it is no longer vague, nor merely correct. It is now The Law of the Land, and woe betide the offender. It has been branded upon marital law, criminal law, family law, laws controlling public expression, medical law, tax law, and legal procedure. It has been imposed upon Parliament and the legislatures. And it is pre-eminently a religion, presided over by the nine high cardinals of the Sacred College, a.k.a. the Supreme Court of Canada, who are appointed through a mystical process that we, the peasantry, could never understand. It runs feminist seminaries called law schools to train the hierarchy for tomorrow and indoctrination centres for the judges of today to make sure that the dogma is strictly observed in everything they decide. It issues daily encyclicals with names such as The Globe and Mail and The Toronto Star who harshly punish the deviant, should any be so blasphemous as to question the infallibility of the Sacred College. Now I've said all this before, and so have numerous other purveyors of the salacious, but not like Martin says it. In 11 horrifying chapters, he shows us how all our worst fears have been realized. He describes, he details, he identifies and he documents beyond all doubt how our Supreme Court has destroyed our national heritage, our constitution and our democracy. Never has any Canadian conservative produced such an incisive catalogue of calamity. But the game is not over yet. Governments can change, and courts can change and, as we saw not long ago in eastern Europe, "state religions" can also change. But we can't change them until we know what we're up against and, thanks to Martin, now we know. I might add that he became late in life a practising Christian, a believer. So perhaps other believers might pray for his recovery. We need him back on the job.




Copyright 2004 Western Standard. All rights reserved.